One can say, they live in Disneyland and inflation does not exist, but thats not an argument. Having a state funded program and its supoort is not the crux of this article. The article demonizes state officials and its authority ovr individual freedom, so i dont see the coherency of the state sponsored statististics you present here. There are countries like sweden that do have vaccination programs that are comparatively efficient when they dont even technically have lockdowns.

Appealing the majority is a logical fallacy if you're attempting to present a case based on logical consistency. Just because the majority belueves in something that ought to be, doesnt mean it is objectively and epistemically true.